Whereas one might agree, support the intentions of President Trump's actions, one needs to always be careful to see that it is not just what is done, but how it is done, both reflect the moral values of the country and its founding ideas as well as achieving something that needs doing.
Modern Gap: note a lack of theology/philosophy in today’s politics, where legal training dominates (e.g., many Congress members are lawyers). This imbalance leads to technically proficient but ethically questionable decisions, like Trump’s overreach, which is seen as lacking the moral grounding that theology/philosophy provides.
Applying to Trump’s Overreach
targeting specific entities like Apple and Harvard raises serious legal issues, likely violating equal protection, due process, First Amendment rights, and statutes like the IRS independence law. While Trump’s broader goals (e.g., U.S. manufacturing, campus safety) may have merit, singling out entities risks unconstitutional retribution, as courts are beginning to signal. Raises concerns about fairness reflects core legal principles, and the “wrongness” sense is backed by constitutional norms favoring uniform rules over selective punishment.
Curtis Neil 05/25/2025
No comments:
Post a Comment